Hmm, interesting...But then, doesn't it depends how old the Steam account is? Since the total of something long term would always look horrible. For instance, if we check how much we spent on public transport/fuel for the period of 10 years -- it will always look astronomical the figure.
An older account, you would have more freebies (especially last few years) than newer account. But there is this annoying duplicated games that lots of Steam games have (e.g.:Company of Heroes 1/2, Warhammer 40K) that further inflates that number. Then you have the betas and FREE/P2W/MMOs games that are a trend for the past 5 years or so too.
Finally, the $5 average per game (I know it's a rough estimate) how far/close from real value is.
Since games used (like 10+ years ago) to be quite costly and fixed with their prices (i.e. not much promotion and/or price-drop due to age). But now we have things like Steam deals that cut prices of games (including major ones) from 75%~99%. And! That is not even talking about Humble deals and foreign Steam keys making most games seriously cheap. (Also a reason I actually buy most games nowadays since it's less troublesome for so many ways -- but there are strict exceptions too)
So the point is, you can get so many games at such a cheap price sending the average down. But then a single full priced purchase would for sure send it quite high too.
But then, should we not just pick a single poison?
Either razor is a rich bastard with no control of his money. OR,
razor is a poor guy strike at deals.
And either he plays crap old games. OR,
He plays too many games and have no life?
I am just confused what/how is this razor guy!
