If someone is ill-informed, doesn't that make them dumb? Or do facts and specificity not matter, just whatever you feel is right, and everyone is a special little flower in their own way, and all words are equal.
Those terms only go hand-in-hand because people give no caution in the words that they employ. What I typed is what I meant, and if I had meant a small-scale, sustainable profit-over-revenue business model, I would have said "small business." What I said was that this is a nice chance for high-risk, high-reward tech groups looking for financial investment and a decent gross margin. That, and existing companies with the ability to extend into new markets, who have already built up a consumer base and have PR to exploit. How is reigning in government overreach, and allowing for more choices to be available, a bad thing, especially when the rules that it set forth were so ambiguous? Even then, the whole thing is just a technicality that will likely be cleared up within the year, after new wording is hammered out.
You should think on updating the rules in Off-topic, pertaining to showing deference to yourself and whatnot, as well.
